DPP: Doing the roster
Sep. 27th, 2012 06:51 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hi, I'll take over here for a couple of days.
Today's proposed topic is the one from the title of the post: DOING THE ROSTER. or if you want Scheduling for the Air Group.
What do you think about this? Are you sorry that we didn't got to see them arguing about it? Do you believe that Lee (or Kara for that matter) took advantage of their position to schedule him(or her)self with someone in particular? Or to avoid someone? Who had the last word when scheduling the rookies? What about squadrons?
Yes, I know it's not really a shippy subject but it started bugging me a while back that even if in fic we see some of this in canon we see nothing. And then it's the difference in between the board that we see in "33" and the one from "Passage". Not to mention that I trust the shipper nation to make everything shippy :)
One last comment: we accept all kinds of payment here at the DPP - pics, ideas, discussions, drabbles, fic recs, etc.....

Today's proposed topic is the one from the title of the post: DOING THE ROSTER. or if you want Scheduling for the Air Group.
What do you think about this? Are you sorry that we didn't got to see them arguing about it? Do you believe that Lee (or Kara for that matter) took advantage of their position to schedule him(or her)self with someone in particular? Or to avoid someone? Who had the last word when scheduling the rookies? What about squadrons?
Yes, I know it's not really a shippy subject but it started bugging me a while back that even if in fic we see some of this in canon we see nothing. And then it's the difference in between the board that we see in "33" and the one from "Passage". Not to mention that I trust the shipper nation to make everything shippy :)
One last comment: we accept all kinds of payment here at the DPP - pics, ideas, discussions, drabbles, fic recs, etc.....

Re: P.S. Possibly relevant, not rosters per say but CAGly stuff
Date: 2012-09-27 09:06 pm (UTC)